![]() |
||||||
Commentary from Dave DurenbergerSeptember 11, 2007 |
||||||
| SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 | ||||||
|
There are more "frequent flyer elites" riding in Northwest Airlines' coach section between MSP and Washington, D.C. than any other destination. So I felt lucky that at 7:15 am on a beautiful September morning I was riding "up in first" while the Mayor of St. Paul rode coach. We ended that day riding with two Twin Cities' businessmen in a brand new van from Detroit to our homes in St. Paul. Today Mayor Norm Coleman is running for re-election to the United States Senate, taking frequent trips to an Iraq I visited once in 1989, and spending 9-11-07 in Washington, D.C. listening to General David Petraeus and Ambassador Ryan Crocker predict the future. What has happened in the intervening six years I could not have imagined when we stood in the Detroit Airport World Club mesmerized by television coverage of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon in flames. Or while riding home to Minnesota with Mayor Coleman making arrangements to secure city hall and working with Governor Jesse Ventura to organize a prayer service in St. Paul the next Sunday. I recall seeing only one clue to the future on that trip back. Starting with our first gas refill before crossing from Michigan into Illinois and ending just outside St. Paul at 11 pm, we watched the price of gasoline slowly climb from its average that day of about $1.25 gallon to somewhere around $1.60. I remember how proud I was of how people everywhere cried and prayed and promised and committed to help relieve the suffering and put a stop to the terrorism that caused it. Yes, there was some laughing and street dancing. But, on reflection, it was largely those who today are claiming to be Al Qaeda or Hamas of this-that-or the other country. I was so proud of my new President. Of the way he captured exactly how every one of us felt and every nation's leader claimed to feel, about the threat to everyone in the world from the phenomenon that had finally hit at some of the biggest targets in America, making the most powerful country in the world as targetable as a Munich beer hall, a London subway, or a Kenyan embassy. With three terms of experience in the Senate and eight on the Senate's Select Committee on Intelligence, I also felt a sense of relief. It was now possible to rally the American people and world leaders behind a concerted collaborative effort to root out terrorism by individuals and anarchic groups as a means of imposing their will on others. Whether you call it a war or not, the battle against national and international terrorism began 9-12-01 and the U.S. was elected to lead it. What we know now from journalists who have covered the history of the last six years, is that we accepted the responsibility and then changed the definition of terror. We went after the Al Qaeda we knew in Afghanistan and their Taliban protectors. Then we created an Al Qaeda out of a dictator in Iraq by exaggerating or lying about his international threat. We nailed the dictator good. The war on terrorism, though, turned into something totally unexpected. The President's party lost the Congress over it and is begging the new Congress and the American people for five more years to figure out how to extract 160,000 young American men and women from a country most of them couldn't find on a map when they were in grade school. Today I will pray. For President Bush, Vice President Cheney, and the Congress. For world leaders I know by name. For the young men and women who serve our country in the military, national and homeland security agencies, police and other state and local security personnel. They all volunteered for these jobs while others their age and circumstance chose other, presumably safer, careers. I once heard Senator Ted Kennedy say to a small group of us,"not everyone who dies for their country is wearing a uniform." He knows that from personal experience. So do the families on the four 9-11-01 airplanes and the people in the tall and pentagonal buildings. God knows America has always been like that and always will be, because he knows the real difficulties each and their families face better than I. He knows the price leaders pay and the price paid for failed leadership. So, from my heart, "God Bless America." |
||||||
| NATIONAL HEALTH POLICY | ||||||
WHO'S NO. 1
That's why Carol Keehan is my definition of the most influential person in healthcare and health policy in this country. I doubt she's ever won a popularity contest. But no one who has ever worked with Carol Keehan has come away with anything but the greatest admiration for her. She is someone you want to be with and to work with. You know together you're going somewhere. A dozen years ago an EVP at HCA told me that "the most powerful competitor to HCA in the hospital field are the Catholics, if they can ever get their acts together." A lot of merging helped. But not until Carol Keehan took over the CHA reins, and especially since she laid the ethics of mission-driven hospital care on the not-for-profit "community benefit" table, have Catholic hospitals begun to be appreciated - and emulated. Her position on tax-exempt community benefits and transparency is simple. Hospitals need to earn the right to the exemption. By being held accountable to the communities they serve to meet the health care needs that for-profits cannot because of their fiduciary responsibility to shareholders. That's one reason why CHA disagrees with AHA's position that hospitals can use the difference between what Medicare pays and what the hospital "charges" as a "community benefit." Were that the definition of "benefit" to community, then most for-profit hospitals could claim the tax exemption as well. DR. MARK MCCLELLAN is a "hot" name in health policy today. An MD/MBA who has Harvard, Stanford, and a mother who ran as an independent for Governor of Texas in his background, Mark worked in the Clinton Treasury Department and in the Bush FDA and CMS. Today he heads up a center for non-partisan health reform at The Brookings Institution which is funded by philanthropy from WellPoint's Leonard Schaeffer (after whom it's named) to RWJ. He aims to be a non-partisan problem definer/solver for policy-makers who are challenged by the bad "politics" of change. The FDA is already on his list and others will follow, including facets of Medicare. DIAGNOSING THE MEDICAL ARMS RACE SYNDROME Rowe's former colleagues on the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission have recently begun an analysis of physician and hospital relationships with an eye toward Medicare payment changes that would foster improved beneficiary and trust fund value from both collaboration (as in things like gain-sharing) and competition (as in physician-owned imaging and surgical facilities). MedPAC analyst Jeff Stensland will appear along with former CMS administrator Dr. Mark McClellan, CMS' Dr. Barry Straub, and representatives of medical device, hospital and specialty hospitals at a joint NIHP/Medical Technology Leadership Forum October 14-15 on the campus of the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis. For more on MARS, or to register for either event, see the NIHP website. OVERTREATED IS UNIVERSAL COVERAGE THE ANSWER TO HEALTH CARE COSTS? Perhaps ACS can be successful in joining oncologists, Cancer Centers, and every other health care provider and insurance plan in getting public subsidies for health insurance doubled every five years or so. That would help keep pace with the rising incomes of everyone engaged in the medicalization of disease. In the alternative, they could join embryonic public efforts to finance research for the evaluative sciences we need to inform cancer patients and lots of others about the comparative effectiveness, and the cost effectiveness, of the choices with which physicians and surgeons present them. SCHIP - TOO EXPENSIVE OR TOO EXPANSIVE? The SCHIP program is expensive - about $5 billion annually and would need almost $3 billion more per year just to maintain current enrollment levels. But unlike other public health care programs, the expense of the program doesn't appear to be the key sticking point for SCHIP reauthorization. The House has passed a bill that would increase SCHIP spending by $47 billion above current baseline over the next 5 years and the bill passed by the Senate increases new spending by $35 billion over the same period.
While there seems to be bipartisan support for some expansion of SCHIP, there is still some consternation about the appropriate level for this expanded funding. Immediately after Labor Day, as Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) was trying to appoint Senate conferees for the SCHIP conference committee, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) objected (and blocked the process and the appointment of committee members) because he had not received assurances that the Senate would stick with the lower spending levels in its bill and not try to pass the more expensive House version of the bill. The White House has made it clear that President Bush is likely to veto either version of the SCHIP bill and not simply because of the expense or likely funding mechanism (an increased tobacco tax). The White House seems to be preoccupied with the expansion of SCHIP as a government program and the extent to which government coverage might replace or "crowd out" private insurance. In fact, the Administration is so concerned with the issue of crowd out that, at the end of August, CMS issued a letter to state Medicaid officials requiring several strategies be implemented in state SCHIP programs to prevent crowd out. State Medicaid directors have since responded to CMS and asked that these restrictions be lifted. The controversy about crowd out is real, although most economists agree that at lower incomes, families and children don't have significant access to private coverage and that SCHIP or Medicaid is likely the only option for these families. The controversy remains, however, for the very population of children in lower income working families targeted by the SCHIP program. Last week CMS denied New York's request to expand its SCHIP program, thus taking on Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Rangel. They're also taking on a NY Medicaid program with well publicized fraud and abuse. A detailed analysis of the SCHIP program and the current House and Senate Bills can be found at the Kaiser Family Foundation Website. COMMENTS ON OBESITY One of my first impressions of northern California from our second home in Marin County, was how fit everyone appeared to be. Earlier this summer we took in an Oakland A's game and I swore I was back home in Minnesota. Guess it depends on where you look. Last week we took two grandsons to five hours at the Great Minnesota State Fair. By the end Susan and I came independently to the same conclusion: About 50% of Minnesota - not 23.7% - is obese or kids that are headed there given a look at their parents and their eating habits!
HHS AND IMPORT SAFETY SEX AND THE CITY UNITED NO MORE |
||||||
| POLITICS | ||||||
|
WAR IN IRAQ
I can tell when I talk to a Senator just back from a visit to the "surge protectors" in Anbar province. So why bother. This week Petraeus and Crocker and Bush and Gates and Rice will do their thing in Washington, DC. My elected representatives of both parties are powerless to do anything but talk. The good guys I know like John Warner and Chuck Hagel are bailing. I'm getting used to it. Maybe too used to it. I hope not. The only date that counts for average Americans today is November 4, 2008. Unfortunately the only American who doesn't care about that date is President Bush whose plan is simple: "Go replenish the old coffers." NEWT GINGRICH is reportedly testing Fred Thompson's water to see whether Republicans have a greater Presidential appetite than can be satisfied by John McCain, Rudy Giuliani, and the Ronald Reagan/James Dobson impersonators. In the meantime, he continues his own "heath care transformation" motivational speakers' circuit. Audiences respond gratefully to someone who can give them an anecdotal vision of what their instincts tell them should be an American health system. "Non-partisan," however, is not part of his definition. MINNESOTA SENATE POLITICS Minnesota's premiere news analyst, Lori Sturdevant of the Minneapolis Star Tribune, spent last Thursday with Coleman (and 128,000 people) at the State Fair. She couldn't find anyone taking the Senator on on the issue. What did they care about? Bread, butter, and the cost of government. Biggest issues involved transportation issues, especially highway bridges and the taxes (or no new taxes) to resolve them; followed by droughts (and then floods) and what Norm was doing about each. I rode NWA back from a MedPAC meeting in Washington last Friday with Senator Coleman and challenger Ciresi. We spent most of our two hour 20 minute trip in books: the Senator in Richard North Patterson's latest thriller Exit; challenger Ciresi in Emory University professor Drew Westin's Political Brain; and me in Blessed Unrest by Paul Hawken. Our pilot said he remembered flying me to Crookston, MN 30 years ago. Reminding me that what I love most about having served in public office is that people want to remember what you have in common. DEAR LARRY
Misdemeanor disorderly conduct should be no grounds for expulsion from the U.S. Senate, especially when it occurred in an airport 961 miles from the capitol and unrelated to Senate duties. But for a 21st century Republican officeholder to be publicly charged with soliciting same-sex relations anywhere is a crime against a political party which insists on making itself increasingly irrelevant. The Senate's ethical standard is conduct which brings discredit upon the institution. What we know of Larry Craig's conduct in the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport is that it mainly brings discredit on a party which cannot seem to discipline its members' voracious appetite for campaign financing, appropriations from the public purse, and single issue politics. The claim of institutional discredit wrings hollow when only Republican Presidential candidates, the Republican leader who ran Bob Packwood out of the Senate, the Republican Campaign Committee chair, and the Republican ethics co-chair demanded Craig's immediate resignation. THE WASHINGTON POST finds it ironic that last November when Alaska Republican Senator Ted Stevens, a former member of the Capital Yacht Club in Washington D.C., wanted to rejoin the exclusive club so he could more easily enjoy his 38-foot Chris Craft motor boat, his application for membership was sponsored by Senator Larry Craig and a former Craig assistant and energy lobbyist. Apparently Craig owns a 42-foot Bertram yacht and docks it at the club. Larry was also the first Senate member to blast the FBI for "Gestapo tactics" when it raided Ted Stevens home in July. Stevens, who chaired the Senate Ethics Committee for several years when I served on it in the 1980s, says he won't comment on Craig's dilemma after talking to his lawyers "and they advise that I make no comments about any investigations right now." DON'T GET CAUGHT ELECTION 2008
SENATOR CHUCK HAGEL of Nebraska made it official today. He'll not run for certain re-election in Nebraska. Thus leaving the seat to former Democratic Senator Bob Kerry who currently is President of the New School in Greenwhich Village in New York City. (One of whose trustees is fund-raising fugitive Norman Hsu). Both are decorated veterans of Viet Nam with serious independent streaks born of both Nebraska and Viet Nam experiences. Each is wise beyond his job description. Both are respected by members of both parties, making them loved by journalists and constituents, but not admired within their own caucuses. If there is such a thing as a "New Democrat" both might fit that description since politics today makes it easier for a Democrat to move off "the base" than for a Republican. KARL ROVE THE PRINCE OF DARKNESS PROPHET NOT PROFIT Gramlich is most famous for predicting the fall of the easy money housing market for 10 years, having earned the right not to be ignored as chair of the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corp. Bob Reischauer of the Urban Institute recently introduced him in terms we can all relate to: "Ned is to the policy community what an Olympic gold medal decathlete is to sports." You can read what Gramlich has predicted for years in his June book: Subprime Mortgages: America's Latest Boom and Bust. PRIVATE EQUITY ENTERPRISE |
||||||
| OTHER NEWS OF NOTE | ||||||
| On October 4th, the Center for Studying Health System Change will hold a conference on "Health Care Cost and Access Challenges Persist: Initial Findings from HSC's 2007 Site Visits."
The Century Foundation, along with The Commonwealth Fund and AARP, will host a September 14th conference in Washington, D.C. to discuss Business and National Health Care Reform. Contact The Century Foundation for more information. |
||||||
| NIHP EVENTS | ||||||
This event will be held at the University of St. Thomas' Minneapolis campus from 12:00 - 2:00 p.m. on September 20th. Register before September 12 to receive the early registration discount.
Continue following the MARS series on October 15th as Dr. Mark McClellan, former FDA Commissioner and former Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, addresses the impact of government regulation and payment systems on the Medical Arms Race. This event will be held at the University of Minnesota's Coffman Memorial Union from 2:00 - 3:30 p.m. on October 15, 2007. The NIHP has teamed up with the Medical Technology Leadership Forum to host this event. Space is limited, so register early for this event.
|
||||||
| SUBSCRIPTION INFORMATION | ||||||
|
If you wish to SUBSCRIBE to the commentary, please click here. If you wish to UNSUBSCRIBE from the commentary, please click here. |
||||||
| © 2007 National Institute of Health Policy |